| 6 Stupidly Simple Steps to Saving Billions of Gallons of Gas |
| Written by Hank Green | ||
| Wednesday, 07 May 2008 | ||
|
1. Lose Some Weight - 900 M Gallons of Gas 4. Drive a Little Slower - 600 M Gallons of Gas (just for semi trucks) Image via RichardMasoner on Flickr
Comments
(25)
Gas Mileage
written by Craig , May 07, 2008
I definitely agree about the gas mileage and going slower. So much is made about raising the speed limits to get you where you are going faster but in the end unless you are taking a cross country trip, you save very little actual time while drasticly reducing your MPG. It would be nice if there was a sight that you could put in your year/make/model of car and then differences in speed to see how it would affect your MPG.
...
written by Enrique , May 07, 2008
Unfortunately Humans act when there is pain. Norway which is an oil producing country,charges $8.00 per gallon to its citizens.
The only thing is going to change American's habits is when a gallon of gasoline reaches $8.00.
Slow down - save gas
written by Shay , May 07, 2008
I've started going between 60-65 on the freeways. I know after many years of driving my car that that's its sweet spot. I get some irritated looks from people as they pass me on a 70mph freeway(probably trying to figure out if I'm elderly or on my cell phone!), but I can coax about 20 miles more out of my 12 gallons of gas that way. Worth it to me.
Hm
written by Ivo , May 07, 2008
What's wrong with a smaller car?
35 MPG cars
written by BBM , May 07, 2008
But if we, in America, had 35 MPG cars today, like the currently do in Europe,
We already have plenty of cars that get 35 MPG here. People just haven't been buying them. The other suggestions are no brainers, though.
Fuel Price
written by Leuke Marriott , May 07, 2008
Here in Australia, we pay around $1.40 a liter for fuel.. Is it about 4 liter's to the gallon? that would be $5.50 a gallon. But so many people still drive, and they don't car pool. I hate that. It would be so easy to car pool, and you wouldn't even put out. There would be so many people living in the same area, going to the same area...
...
written by Josh , May 07, 2008
I don't think we could really lower the speed limit on the interstates. I tried to drive 60 from Texas to Florida once. It ended up adding an extra day to the trip, so the extra hotel night made up for the gas savings. I do drive slower around town. Shay is right. On the freeway, 5-10 mph doesn't matter that much.
Also, times are changing a bit. Americans are buying more small cars and a lot less trucks. It's so bad that Chrysler is offering a deal where you can lock in $2.99/gallon on new vehicles, even those big Hemi-Dodge Rams. It's a sign they are having a lot of trouble selling them. We just bought a new Chevy Colorado, and the much bigger Silverado, with much worse gas mileage, was stickered at only a few hundred more than the small truck. Times are certainly changing here.
...
written by Brittany Toman , May 07, 2008
My husband and I made the decision about three months ago change our habits of driving everywhere and use bikes. We don't live in a major city, so this was a big deal to us. My husband bikes to work everyday and I use my bike with a children's bike trailer attached whenever I need to do an errand within a ten mile radius. We downsized from two cars that each used a tank a week to one car that used less than half a tank in two weeks. Not only do we feel better, but it's an such a pleasant experience. I'd say if you can make the change, go for it! At first it's hard, but oh-so-rewarding.
Bad news about 35MPG cars and expensive
written by Anonymous , May 07, 2008
I bought one 35MPG unleaded-87 car in 2004 when the price of a gallon was about $1.49. I've reduced trips to see my family -- the last time I saw most of them was a funeral in 2006. I've reduced my vacations, because hey, who can afford to fly or drive anymore? The reason people drive less when gas is expensive is because they can't afford to drive. And if it gets much worse I won't be able to continue working. I'm not hundreds of miles from work, I'm 7 miles from work. And I'm missing a leg. And the bus stops 3/4 mile from work. And I'm the starter at 5AM, meaning that if they installed a bus stop, it wouldn't help at all. And good luck finding a carpool at the asscrack of dawn.
So here's an idea. Focus on efficient vehicles. I don't care if it's an SUV speeding past me as long as it's at least getting 25MPG -- better than most of the sedans my overpaid management drives! Or, vehicles that you can seamlessly toggle between performance and economy. Better traffic systems, as you mentioned. Alternative fuels that don't rob us of food (also on the rise, thank you so much Mr. Government) such as compressed-air and hydrogen. Better batteries and plug-in hybrids.
Slower Trucks
written by nicster , May 07, 2008
One of the problems with lowering the speed of trucks is that the drivers are incented to drive faster. Often, they're paid by the load or by the trip so the faster they get done, the more they get paid. They also have limits on how many hours they can be on the road each day.
The first problem can be helped by incenting drivers to drive slower. Maybe giving them a bonus if they keep mpgs over a certain limit. The second problem is probably harder to fix. With regards to cars and trucks in general I know that for me, simple awareness helps. My latest car has an mpg display. It gives me much more immediate feedback on my driving habits than the old method of checking the mileage at the next fill-up. If all cars had constant mpg displays drivers would have better tools to help decrease usage.
MPG Monitor
written by Josh , May 07, 2008
I purchased a Scan Guage II online. It is a pretty good device that gives instant feedback, doesn't cost too much and works on everything from 1996 on up. It's how I get over 25 mpg in my car for city driving when it's only rated for 20.
Fat people
written by Tordus Elshevek , May 07, 2008
The government should make a tax on fat people. A sliding scale can be designed that provides an incentive for fat people to reduce their weight.
The airlines should also put seat surcharges on fat people. Why should fat people use thin people's resources without paying extra for it?
Tire Pressure
written by Meredith , May 07, 2008
I drive a Civic Hybrid (usually getting 45-50 MPG) and one of the coolest features is that I have a gage that shows instant MPG and the average MPG for the "trip". Over the past several years, this has really highlighted how important it is to have properly inflated tires. I always know that when my MPG drops a few, I check the tire pressure, which is usually low. Majority of the time, once I have properly inflated tires again, my MPG is back to normal.
...
written by Lex , May 07, 2008
We could start driving standard transmissions again, that would change our gasoline consumption drastically. Neutral stops, much lower revs at highway speeds, etc. Fuel consumption is not so much a factor of speed as it is one of rpm's. The vehicle traveling at 70mph turning 1500 rpm vs the same vehicle at the same speed turning 2500 rpm is filling the total engine displacement 1000 fewer times per minute. (it doesn't take long for that to add up)
Many automatic transmissions in production today have only four gears. And while five and six speed automatics exist (and are becoming more common), it is much cheaper/easier to build a five or six speed standard transmission than an automatic with the same number of gears.
...
written by T , May 07, 2008
I've been reading a book called Factor 4, and it talks about rewarding companies for the resources it saves instead of the resources it sells. Are there ANY monetary incentives for gas companies to sell less of what it has?
@Lex
written by Harry Ulm , May 07, 2008
Your information/knowledge of automatic transmissions is old and limited. The RPMs at highways speeds are usually identical or the automatic will have lower RPMs.
Since the advent of the lockup torque convertor there has been no RPM disparity. Your example of 70MPH 1500RPM versus 2400RPM is ridiculous.
...
written by Srini , May 08, 2008
Why no one is talking about public transport system?
...
written by Virgil , May 08, 2008
You forgot #7 - DON'T DRIVE!
In all seriousness, this list is a joke when you consider the major issue here is the design of our country's infrastructure. In my home city (the 3rd largest in NY) I could take a bus to work - if I didn't mind working from 9am to 4pm and waiting for an hour - that's right - one bus per hour for 7 hours a day, 5 days a week - for a city of a million people! The interstate system was designed for moving BETWEEN cities, and was never ever meant for commuting INTO cities, but as soon as the developers cottoned on to cheap land prices (and cheap gas), the suburbs were born, and we're all doomed to deal with the consequences. As a life-long inner city dweller, I sincerely look forward to the idiots who bought McMansions 30 miles outside town, banging on the door to buy my house because they can't afford to get to work anymore. Tough doodoo brother - you should have thought about it before you plunked down the cash for that shiny SUV. It will take decades to retrofit the infrastructure of this country, to account for past mistakes. Billions of dollars for fitting light railways, public transport, better facilities in downtowns, walkable communities. Until we begin to address this problem, the whole debate about gas usage is just "running up the down elevator" James Howard Kunstler's book "The Geography of Nowhere" is a must-read for anyone interested in the topic.
...
written by AndyM , May 08, 2008
Running up the down elevator? Wouldn't one get crushed that way?
Interstates
written by AndyM , May 08, 2008
No, the Interstate system was designed to move armies. The fact that civilians could also use it was simply a bonus, one that made the expense palatable. And I don't consider how we used it to be a "mistake" in any fashion. Human beings make decisions based on the situation as it is, or at least as we interpret it. Monday-morning quarterback it all you like, enjoy your premature schadenfreude all you like, it does not make these people any more stupid than someone who spends two million for a property on the Upper West Side.
As for me, I live in the "near-burbs". My house is in the middle of my own private forest, but I am five miles from the state capital. I would have bought property downtown, but paying $500 a square foot made no sense for my family when I could pay $60. As for those who bought homes 30 miles out of town (and not all of them are "McMansions") what I see coming is an increase in more local shops and such for them. That combined with more employers allowing people to work from home, which will increasingly become a significant perk that costs the employer little, I see a great deal of adaptation coming. It is hubris to assume that your "inner city" life means that you live in the center of the universe.
Stop Stupid Political gestures.
written by Ashb , May 08, 2008 Don’t subside gas, Instead of Gas tax holiday, subside high mileage Cars. If people trade in a gas guzzler's and buy a high Mileage car, give them a tax break.
Telecommuting
written by Ben , May 08, 2008
This might be a bit selfish, too, but it's damn sure green. I'm a computer programmer, and I commute to work everyday. Thankfully it's only 10 miles (my old job was 40), but I do drive because there's no good way to go via mass transit. But there's honestly no reason for me to be here at all. Telecommuting would use no gas (and I've signed up for a green electric option at home). Obviously not every job is one that can be done remotely, but like so many other things, there can be significant benefits to a company that lets employees who can telecommute do so. It's just inertia that keeps them doing things the old way. Maybe some tax incentives for companies that allow it would help (though it's hard to check up on). Or maybe more and more employees clamoring for it as gas prices continue to rise will do it. Here's hoping.
Re: Ben
written by AndyM , May 08, 2008
Even such things as allowing 4-10 schedules or 8-9s and an 8 (with every other Friday off) would work wonders. Even better would be where you work from home on MWF and go in to the office on TTh. Meetings and such could be planned for the latter.
...
written by MarkR , May 08, 2008
Tordus Elshevek said, "The government should make a tax on fat people."
Thats exactly why my wife and I got rid of our UT football season tickets, Everyone is alloted 24 inches, and to many people have a A$$ bigger than that. because of all the morbidly obease people sitting around us We were starting to feel like couple of pimples being squeezed, afraid we were going to get shot out on the field. Large people should pay a surcharge for their size, flights should make them buy two seats and we should have extra wide spaces that they charge more at events for the big people.
...
written by MarkR , May 08, 2008
AndyM schooling Virgil.
I'm with ya Andy. I'm on the economic development board for my Texas burb. And we are growing by leaps and bounds in this recession as business are moving in. a positive 12% growth this year so far. over 20% growth the last 2 years. And I'm not talking new houses. I'm talking only the business growth. And your right most big city folk think, they are the center of the universe. I agree there will be more smaller shops in the future in the burbs, because I'm seeing it happen right now. The burbs will and are becoming stand alone city's. City people that think everyone should live they way they do have swallowed to much of their own Kool Aid. Also you should school Virgil on the fact that a lot of stretches of interstate are also made to land large Air Force Cargo/troop transports. | ||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.
And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.