.jpg)
A new material made by researchers in
The new material provides a “stepping-stone” for electrons to move from a low energy level to an intermediate energy level as they absorb photons, allowing more photons of lower energy levels (and thus different parts of the light spectrum) to be utilized. So while some efficiency research goes into breaking down what is absorbed into specific wavelengths or trapping light for greater absorption, this technology basically helps to cast a really wide net to increase how much light can be captured and turned into energy.
The new material hasn’t been tested yet for just how much it can gather, but it has a theoretical absorption rate of 63% so the scientists reason that the actual absorption will be higher than conventional semiconductor solar cells. This is a step up from the first “stepping-stone” solar cells that achieved a theoretical capture rate of 57%.
In geek-speak:
Calculations for indium thiospinel semiconductors substituted at octahedral sites with isolated transition metals (M=Ti,V) show an isolated partially filled narrow band containing three t2g-type states per M atom inside the usual semiconductor band gap. Thanks to this electronic structure feature, these materials will allow the absorption of photons with energy below the band gap, in addition to the normal light absorption of a semiconductor... leading to an enhancement of the absorption coefficient in both infrared and visible ranges of the solar spectrum. This electronic structure feature could be applied for developing a new third-generation photovoltaic cell.
So, the early versions of the materials match the properties predicted by the researchers to enable it to absorb infrared. Now we just have to wait for the material to be turned into an actual solar cell so we can know just what the size of this improvement is.
Via TreeHugger, New Scientist, Physical Review Letters; photo via vogelium

written by Clinch, August 05, 2008
I really hope not.
And I'm also curious about the cost of this as well, efficiency is great, but if it's not affordable, then it wont be successful (possibly the problem the 57% from 2004 had)
written by check your facts, August 05, 2008
http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/dn14436-solarcell-material-can-soak-up-more-sun.html?feedId=online-news_rss20
at least they give a link to the original research, which you fail to provide (at least mention who'd done it). Also solar cells don't have a maximum theoretical efficiency of 40%. A single bandgap material is limited to just above 30%, and you could go up to ~ 80% with an infinite number of gaps. In any case 40% has already been experimentally demonstrated in three junction cells.
written by check your facts, August 05, 2008
http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/MSD-full-spectrum-solar-cell.html
written by Karkus, August 06, 2008
Please remove it and just provide a link to the original article.
Here's some of the other issues.
1) The materials used by these guys are still semiconductors. They just modify the semiconductor material by adding dopants.
2)The problems isn't necessary the low absorption rate of semiconductors (for example, low bandgap semiconductors actually absorb almost all the photons.) So the main issue is not % absorption, but rather how much of the energy you can turn into useable eletrical energy. That depends on the bandgap, and there's a tradeoff between not absorbing photons with energy below the bandgap vs. wasting excess energy off photons with energy above the bandgap. This research is one way to try to get around this tradeoff.
written by Karkus, August 06, 2008
written by NS, August 06, 2008
written by Uncle B, September 29, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
Charles Precht
Sustainable Design
www.sustainablehomeplans.com