
A new washing machine design uses 90 percent less water and reduces utility bills by 30 percent by cleaning clothes with tiny plastic beads.
The machine by UK company Xeros Ltd uses 3mm-long nylon beads that can get into all crevices and folds of clothing and absorb stains and dirt. Stephen Burkinshaw, a polymer chemist at Leeds University, discovered that nylon beads at 100 percent humidity could attract stains away from clothing and into the center of the beads, preventing deposition back onto the clothes.
The machine uses a small amount of water to dampen the clothes and to reach the right humidity level, then the drum is flooded with the beads. When the cycle is complete the beads drain away with the water to be reused hundreds of times.
I'm sure you've already started questioning what happens to these plastic beads once they're done scrubbing clothes. The company wants to eventually create a closed loop where the saturated beads can be refreshed and reused in the machines, but for the time being they will be collected and recycled.
Xeros says that if all of the US used these machines instead of regular washing machines, it would save 1.2 billion tonnes of water per year and the CO2 emissions saved would equal taking 5 million cars off the road. The machine would also eliminate the need to dry clean many delicates, another environmental benefit. The Xeros machine is expected to be available by the end of next year.
via Guardian

written by Eric, March 11, 2010
written by Gil Friend, March 11, 2010
They say "for the time being they [the millions of nylon beads] will be collected and recycled" -- by whom? People doing laundry at home? Not likely. The sewage treatment works? Not happy -- or likely.
Either this is "green sorta but not really" or someone's not telling us something. ( wonder too if they've factored the net energetics of the nylon beads...
written by Molly, March 11, 2010
written by Stefan Hayden, March 11, 2010
written by hyperspaced, March 12, 2010
... That's definitely not the way to go green people.
written by Evan, March 12, 2010
written by Andrew, March 12, 2010
written by Livia, March 14, 2010
That's is a very sharp double-edged sword there.
written by casey, March 14, 2010
2. Won't the beads tear up the more delicate clothes?
3. How often would they have to be changed, and how expensive is that? (And how much carbon is created by producing and transporting them?)
4. The beads may work on the visual stain, but can they absorb or deal with odor? Will the clothes smell fresh?
5. Can they be used in conjunction with soap or fabric softener?
written by Alex, March 15, 2010
Combined with high heat (maybe steam) for sterilization this sounds like a great way for the linen services that every hotel and motel use for sheets and towels to save money and water and energy.
1. Less pockets in the sheets to collect beads.
2. Large scale in one place makes the service of bead recycling more efficient.
3. They have a profit motive
4. Since I live in California, saving water sounds very attractive.
written by Keith Fetz, March 15, 2010
written by Astrid Jones, March 15, 2010
written by Victoria Elmore, March 15, 2010
Please take a look at my blog and leave comments: http://victoriaelmore.wordpress.com
Also take a look at www.birminghamrecycled.co.uk
written by ian, March 16, 2010
written by TK, March 16, 2010
I'm sure they could find way to produce the beads from recycled bottles or other plastics, meaning no increased oil dependency, and like the article says the beads are reused for hundreds of washes and the company is working on a solution for how to deal with the beads once they've been used up.
It's not as though the company is claiming this is a perfect product that will end all carbon emissions and save all the water on the planet, but it's a step in the right direction and I honestly think it's disgusted to see people on a green community like this bashing a company that's trying to use new technology and innovation to help us take steps toward a greener world. Unless you all would rather that we just keep on building water hungry washers in every new home, hotel, and hospital that's built around the world.
written by erinn, March 17, 2010
Good luck and great work.
written by me, March 19, 2010
written by Karen, March 24, 2010
written by Raychell, March 26, 2010
I like that people are thinking of great wash to help the environment, keep up the work, I just don't think this device has hit fool proof yet.
written by Carol, March 28, 2010
1. If 10 people in my condo block did their laundry all at once with these micro-beads, might we not cause water pipe blockage and water back-up that will flood our laundry rooms and homes? A poor way to conserve water, I say.
2. These beads are made of nylon, you say. Guess what nylon is made of: petrochemicals.
3. I'm not submitting MY dry-cleanables, or my washables, either, to being pounded by millions of micro-beads. Clothes washed this way will literally "erode" after several washings. My dry-cleaner already uses a super-friendly system without chemicals, and my dry-cleanables last for decades with their careful cleaning system. Most of my washables last for decades, too.
Conclusion: Saving water is important, but not if I have to spend half my annual income replacing my entire wardrobe a few times a year. (I earn less than $10K a year right now. Thanks to great investments I made in clothes many years ago, I only spend about $100 a year on my wardrobe these days.)
written by Zach Smith, May 12, 2010
written by consumer washers, August 31, 2010
written by Snow blower Mark, October 01, 2010
written by washing machines, November 04, 2010
I know all the other parents can agree with me
written by Martin, December 07, 2010
We had to buy a new machine recently and although it purported to meet high energy saving standards etc, the basic quality of it is rubbish. I can that we are going to have to replace it within only a very few years. That kind of 'built in obsolesence' approach to manufacturing is a disgrace.
written by maytag washer, February 09, 2011
written by Condo Staging, June 30, 2011
written by snow blowers reviews, August 24, 2011
written by Mr. Reed, April 05, 2013
Secondly, soil content would be a major issue. The beads are usable for hundreds of washes or so the claim goes, but at what soil level? I would imagine that heavy soils such as in bar mops and kitchen related fats and oils would do a number on the life-span of the beads. There needs to be a serious level of saponification to bring these heavy soils to a manageable level.
Third, the majority of commercial laundries outside of the Mom and Pop operations, are running tunnels with enormous throughput. There would be high level of difficulty associated with the engineering aspects of that sort of endeavor. Who is going beta test that?
Lastly, I’d like the cyclic pollution problem associated with these beads addressed fully prior to a large scale distribution of these beads, i.e. are they going to be classified as toxic waste by the EPA if they are used to clean petroleum products from clothes?
These are just a few of the obvious things that poped into my head when I looked into this technology. All in all it seems like unproven technology in the early stages of scaleup. Who knows...with proper development and control...it may turnout to be a good thing.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
MAR 11
"As far as commercial applications go I would like to comment on 3 poin..."
View all Comments