Vertical farming takes the old idea of a greenhouse and stretches it upwards so that the available growing area is a multiple of the building footprint, as opposed to the 1:1 ratio from a typical greenhouse. A vertical farm building would be a supremely green building because its inhabitants would be (literally) green.
Vertical farming could allow extended growing seasons. The food could be grown organically, and herbicides and pesticides could be eliminated. There would be an enormous reduction in crop loss due to weather and pest damage.
Vertical farming would allow food production to be closer to urban centers, meaning food could be provided with lower transportation and distribution costs.
There are many problems that would need to be addressed to make something like this a practical and wide ranging solution. Housing is already a problem. Extending the construction industry to provide the resources (both material and labor) to build towers for farming would likely push up the cost of all building. The costs and tradeoffs may not yet make this a practical idea, but its day may be coming.
via: Archinect

written by Shawn, February 22, 2007
Xris, I believe the light would be refracted throughout the tower. Not just entering the exterior windows.
written by Hank, February 23, 2007
The biggest problem with the design is simply how much it'll cost to build. Farm land, on the whole, is very cheap, and until that changes, there will be no impetus to build these towers.
written by James S., February 23, 2007
written by Janis Mara, February 23, 2007
Wow, just from an aesthetic point of view, I have to say this puppy is a winner. Let's face it, though I wouldn't kick a solar panel off my roof, in main they are not exactly enhancements to the beauty of a residence. I guess because the building itself is round, or because of the industrial resonance, the dish on top actually looks good!
written by celia, February 23, 2007
written by Steve Nordquist, March 12, 2007
Of course the best part are the shade columns full of bees and trained birds (.....) providing the closest layer of shade to the neighbors. Takeout containers would need to be reused and more airtight...careful about hors d'oevures on the patio, you'll crash the columns!
Wrong shape for wind loads too: Unless they're rotary vanes also (and then; float seals, bearing, power and feedthrough novelty), sorry; too much wind wash for anything to live in. As for the plate on top...Starlight Express (and JSR:Final Stage) was awful.
written by Uncle B, February 02, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
You could not grow food crops in the example building in the photo. Each floor shades the one below it. Other than mushrooms, you can't grow food crops in the shade. In addition, phototropism would cause the growing plants to lean toward what light is available, weakening their growth and shading their neighbors. It would need high-intensity artificial lighting to supplement the little natural light leaking through. Not a "green" solution.