
Small-scale wind turbines can't produce the large amounts of power that their giant brothers can, but there's still room for them in the renewable energy landscape. As an example, cell phone company Core Communications will begin using small vertical-axis wind turbines to power their cell phone towers.
The company will use turbines from Helix Wind that can generate electricity in winds as slow as 10 mph. The turbines will power the towers and any extra electricity will be sold to the grid, giving Core Communications a new source of revenue as well.
The turbines will be installed on a trial basis on cell phone towers in Southern California for three months starting in early 2010. If they perform well enough, additional turbines could be rolled out permanently.
via CNET

written by VeruTEK Green Technologies, November 13, 2009
written by Michael Anderson, November 13, 2009
written by Green Colored Glasses, November 13, 2009
written by Anton, November 15, 2009
written by Ammo Guy, November 16, 2009
Let's take it one step further...
Put wind turbines on top of hi-tension electrical towers.
The power companies already own the right-of-way. The tower is already there. Two BIG hurdles are out of the way.
Why not?
If and when Cap-n-Tax goes through
there's your carbon offset to keep taxes down. WIN, WIN.
Thank you,
The Ammo Guy
Aim small, miss small.




written by Carrie, November 18, 2009
written by driver8, November 20, 2009
written by Mehul Kamdar, November 24, 2009
Thanks!
written by pj, November 30, 2009
written by Konstantinos Tolias, December 03, 2009
written by Scooter, December 14, 2009
written by mao, September 18, 2012
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
That is, aren't they already a minimal draw on the grid, such that switching one renewable energy source for another makes very little difference, in terms of overall impact?
[I could be wrong. Tell me I'm wrong]
Or is the story here that cell towers are an existing infrastructure that a small-scale wind-power grid could piggyback on?
That would be cool, but I take it it's up to the study to determine whether that's actually a cost-effective contribution to the energy mix, which we don't know yet.
Or should we just be happy that the chemical and carbon cost of turbines is lower than pv cells doing the same thing?